Education Law Newsletter

STAY ON TOP OF THE LATEST EDUCATION LAW UPDATES

WITH OUR EHDUCATION NEWSLETTER 

Our education law newsletter is a monthly publication outlining recent decisions and articles that can impact the workplace of educational institutions.

The articles listed below are intended to provide readers with general information. They should not be regarded or relied upon as legal advice or opinion.

 

Filter by :

October 7, 2020 – OLRB Dismisses Unions’ Appeal of Province’s Back to School Plan

October 7, 2020

OLRB Dismisses Unions’ Appeal of Province’s Back to School Plan OSSTF et al v Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, 2020 CRTO The Unions alleged that the Ministry of Education’s Guide to Re-opening Schools violated the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) and appealed the Ministry of Labour’s refusal to inspect and/or issue orders to the Ministry of Education under OHSA to correct the deficiencies of the Guide. The OLRB dismissed the Unions’ appeals holding that it did not have jurisdiction to deal with them absent an inspection conducted by a Ministry of Labour inspector.   HUMAN RIGHTS…

Read More +

September 8, 2020 – Ontario Superior Court of Justice: The Ontario Government is in a Better Position than the Courts to Assess and Address School Attendance Risks

September 8, 2020

Ontario Superior Court of Justice: The Ontario Government is in a Better Position than the Courts to Assess and Address School Attendance Risks Chase v Chase, 2020 ONSC 5083 The Applicant mother brought an urgent motion to obtain sole decision-making ability for educational decisions respecting her child. The mother requested that her child be registered and attend school in-person in September 2020. The Respondent father requested that their child remain at home until such time that the School Board’s safety protocols are proven successful and that leading health experts are able to offer more certainty relating to the safety of students…

Read More +

August 5, 2020 – School Board’s Directive Requiring Teachers to Remain in School Until 4 p.m. Was Reasonable

August 5, 2020

School Board’s Directive Requiring Teachers to Remain in School Until 4 p.m. Was Reasonable The Portage la Prairie Teachers’ Association v The Portage la Prairie School Division, 2020 MBQB 93 The Union brought an Application for judicial review of an arbitrator’s decision holding that the School Division’s directive requiring teachers to remain in school and available until 4:00 p.m. each day, regardless of whether they have assigned duties after the instructional day, which ends at 3:20 p.m., was reasonable. The Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench dismissed the application for judicial review and held that the directive was reasonable, due in part on…

Read More +

June 30, 2020 – School Board’s Decision to Demote Principal is Quashed on Judicial Review

June 30, 2020

School Board’s Decision to Demote Principal is Quashed on Judicial Review Oberg v Saskatchewan (Board of Education of the South East Cornerstone School Division No. 209), 2020 SKQB 96 A School Principal applied for judicial review of the decision of the School Board by which he was removed from his position as a School Principal because of conflict of interest and conduct unbecoming of a School Principal. The Court of Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan quashed the decision to demote the principal, holding that the School Board breached its duty of procedural fairness toward the employee. The School Board demoted a school…

Read More +

March 3, 2020 – Union’s Advice to Teachers did Not Amount to Unlawful Strike

March 3, 2020

Union’s Advice to Teachers did Not Amount to Unlawful Strike Halton District School Board v Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario, 2020 CanLII 5702 The School Board’s grievance alleged that the Union, in advising teachers not to participate in mandatory Behaviour Management Systems training, amounted to an unlawful strike. The arbitrator dismissed the grievance and determined that the Union’s advice to its members did not amount to calling, causing, authorizing, counseling, procuring, supporting, encouraging or threatening to call an unlawful strike.   CIVIL LITIGATION AH v Alberta (Minister of Education), 2020 ABCA 54 The Plaintiffs’ action against the Ministry of Education of Alberta…

Read More +

January 30, 2020 – Smudging Ceremony in School Not Found to be a Charter Infringement

January 30, 2020

Smudging Ceremony in School Not Found to be a Charter Infringement Servatius v Alberni School District No. 70, 2020 BCSC 15 The Court determined the School Board did not infringe on the religious freedoms of the Applicant and her two children (who were students of the School Board). The Applicant alleged that the smudging ceremony conducted by an Indigenous Elder at the school interfered with the religious freedoms of herself and her two children.   CIVIL LITIGATION Makela v Horizon School Division No 67, 2019 ABQB 974 The Plaintiff’s Action for damages for wrongful dismissal against his former employer, the School Board,…

Read More +

November 28, 2019 – Student’s expulsion for alleged sexual assault quashed on appeal

November 28, 2019

TS v Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board, 2019 CFSRB 61 The School Board’s decision to expel the Appellant, a student who allegedly committed sexual assault on another student at school, was quashed on appeal by the Child and Family Services Review Board (CFSRB). The CFSRB determined that the School Board had not established that the student was sexually assaulted by the Appellant and found that there was no basis to expel the student.   CRIMINAL LAW R v McAnally, 2019 ONSC 6028 A teacher charged with electronic transmission of child pornography, sexual touching and sexual assault involving students is found not guilty.  …

Read More +

October 31, 2019 – Arbitrator upholds without pay suspension of teacher who remained silent when faced with allegations of inappropriate conduct with students

October 31, 2019

Ontario English Catholic Teachers’ Association v Brant Haldimand Norfolk Catholic District School Board, 2019 CanLII 95001 (ON LA) An arbitrator upheld the three-month suspension without pay of a teacher who refused to answer questions during an investigation pertaining to his inappropriate conduct with two students. The teacher chose to exercise his right to remain silent in response to his employer’s inquiries in light of the fact that he was potentially facing criminal charges.   LABOUR RELATIONS Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario v Bluewater District School Board, 2019 CanLII 90975 (ON LA) An arbitrator upheld the School Board’s position that its kindergarten class…

Read More +

September 19, 2019 – OLRB determines that bargaining issues raised by OSSTF are to be bargained centrally

September 19, 2019

Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation v. The Crown in Right of Ontario, et al. (September 6, 2019 – OLRB) OSSTF filed two applications before the OLRB under the School Boards Collective Bargaining Act, 2014 (SBCBA) with respect to secondary school teachers in the English language public school system and support staff in the various school systems represented by OSSTF. Both applications were for the OLRB to determine whether certain matters fell within the scope of central or local bargaining under the SBCBA. The specific matters related to such items as class size provisions for teachers, preparation time for Early Childhood Educators, new forms…

Read More +

August 13, 2019 – Arbitrator upholds teacher’s termination for inappropriate relationships with students

August 13, 2019

Sudbury Catholic District School Board and OECTA, Re, 2019 CarswellOnt 4511 The grievor, an automotive technology teacher with three (3) years of service, was terminated for inappropriate relationships with two female students. The inappropriate behaviour included discussions about a sexually transmitted disease, helping one of the students get a tattoo, paying for part of it and driving her home thereafter. The grievor also gave one of the students money to purchase a sex toy, sent frequent and inappropriate text messages and had the two students sign a contract that they were not having sex. The Arbitrator, in upholding the termination of the…

Read More +